Agreements not as significant as security concerns in U.S.-Japan association

Security

The President of the United States Donald Trump proclaimed, in private talks, how he intends to abolish the U.S.-Japan security agreement following worries regarding the association’s unfair terms. This was I immediately trailed by persistence from Tokyo over how it had checked with the White House how this wasn’t standard United States govt. policy. This highlighted the tension among Trump administration’s attention on obtaining reasonable agreements for the citizens of America and American security primacies.

Donald Trump is correct in how he is looking for the finest possible deals for the taxpayers of America.

However, on a broader scale, agreeing to better arrangements should not throw a match to significant U.S. strategic interests.

It is true that the security relationship between the United States and Japan has injustices, however, they are far from outrageous.

In 2016, American bases amounted to $5.5 billion and, as a consequence of the deal made in 2015, Japan paid about $1.65-$1.95 million each year so as to back them, as stated by a 2017 report by the Pentagon. The report added how, in year 2016, Tokyo paid an added $1 billion in base-linked labor.

These digits imply how, in year 2016, Japan would have paid nearly $2.75 billion for the purpose of housing American bases on their land. Resultantly, the United States will be left to pay the outstanding tab which is nearly $2.75 billion.

Going a couple of years back, in year 2004 the Pentagon’s Allied Contributions to the Common Defense overview showed how Tokyo paid $3.2 billion in direct and $1.18 billion in indirect support. When added up, these made up for 74.5% of the overall cost of the United States military’s security umbrella.

The Defense Minister in year 2017, Tomomi Inada, contributed to this data in 2017 by stating how Tokyo was paying nearly 86.4% of the overall cost of the United States military’s security umbrella. These figures can be used to clearly justify how Washington has, many a time, managed to land the upper hand in this agreement.

In spite of that, Donald Trump has argued that Japan as well as other allies of the U.S. must pay up greater amount for the advantages on U.S. protection. A report by Bloomberg stated how Donald Trump is backing a policy which makes allies cover the total cost of housing U.S. troops along with a 50% additional payment for the benefit of American protection.